|
Foreword |
6 |
|
|
Preface |
8 |
|
|
Introduction |
10 |
|
|
Part I: Full Digital I&C and HMIT Systems |
10 |
|
|
Part II: Risk Monitor Methods for Large and Complex Plants |
11 |
|
|
Part III: Condition Monitors for Plant Components |
11 |
|
|
Part IV: Virtual and Augmented Reality for Nuclear Power Plants |
12 |
|
|
Part V: Software Reliability V&V for Nuclear Power Plants |
12 |
|
|
Acknowledgements |
14 |
|
|
Contents |
16 |
|
|
Part I: Full Digital I&C and HMIT Systems |
19 |
|
|
1: Mitsubishi’s Computerized HSI and Digital I&C System for PWR Plants |
20 |
|
|
1.1 Introduction |
20 |
|
|
1.2 Mitsubishi’s Digital I&C Design Features |
21 |
|
|
1.2.1 Overview System Description |
21 |
|
|
1.2.2 Implementation in New Plants |
22 |
|
|
1.2.3 Digital Upgrading |
22 |
|
|
1.3 HSI System’s V&V Program for Digital I&C Design |
22 |
|
|
1.3.1 Design Features of Mitsubishi’s HSI System |
22 |
|
|
1.3.2 Implementation of the HSI System in the US-APWR |
23 |
|
|
1.3.3 V&V Test Methodology |
24 |
|
|
1.3.4 V&V Results |
24 |
|
|
1.4 Conclusions |
25 |
|
|
References |
25 |
|
|
2: Design of an Integrated Operator Support System for Advanced NPP MCRs: Issues and Perspectives |
27 |
|
|
2.1 Introduction |
27 |
|
|
2.2 Operator Support Systems |
28 |
|
|
2.2.1 What Are Operator Support Systems? |
28 |
|
|
2.2.2 Human Cognitive Process Model of MCR Operators |
29 |
|
|
2.2.3 Operator Support Systems for Cognitive Processes |
31 |
|
|
2.2.3.1 Support Systems for the Monitoring/Detection Activity |
31 |
|
|
2.2.3.2 Support Systems for the Situation Assessment Activity |
31 |
|
|
2.2.3.3 Support Systems for the Response Planning Activity |
32 |
|
|
2.2.3.4 Support Systems for the Response Implementation Activity |
32 |
|
|
2.2.4 Integrated Decision Support System to aid Cognitive Activities of Operators (INDESCO) |
32 |
|
|
2.3 How to Evaluate Operator Support Systems |
33 |
|
|
2.3.1 Theoretical Evaluation Approach Using BBN Model |
33 |
|
|
2.3.1.1 Assumptions for Evaluations |
34 |
|
|
2.3.1.2 BBN Model for Situation Assessment of a Human Operator |
34 |
|
|
2.3.1.3 HRA Event Trees |
35 |
|
|
2.3.1.4 Evaluation Scenarios |
35 |
|
|
2.3.1.5 Evaluation Results |
36 |
|
|
2.3.2 Experimental Evaluation Using Workload and Accuracy |
37 |
|
|
2.3.2.1 Implementation of the Target System |
37 |
|
|
2.3.2.2 Experiment Conditions and Measures |
38 |
|
|
2.3.2.3 Evaluation Results |
38 |
|
|
2.4 Issues and Perspectives for Operator Support Systems |
39 |
|
|
2.4.1 Trust of Operators on Operator Support Systems |
39 |
|
|
2.4.2 Necessary and Useful Information |
39 |
|
|
2.4.3 Evaluation of Operator Support Systems |
40 |
|
|
2.4.4 Operators’ Dependence on Operator Support Systems |
40 |
|
|
2.5 Summary and Conclusion |
40 |
|
|
References |
41 |
|
|
3: Concept of Advanced Back-up Control Panel Design of Digital Main Control Room |
43 |
|
|
3.1 Introduction |
43 |
|
|
3.2 Necessary of Advanced BCP |
44 |
|
|
3.3 Issues for Advanced BCP Design |
44 |
|
|
3.3.1 Design Overview of Advanced BCP |
44 |
|
|
3.3.1.1 Configuration of BCP |
44 |
|
|
3.3.2 Functional Assignment of BCP |
44 |
|
|
3.3.3 Design of QDS-N |
45 |
|
|
3.3.3.1 Allocation |
45 |
|
|
3.3.3.2 System Configuration |
46 |
|
|
3.3.3.3 Diversity |
46 |
|
|
3.3.3.4 Qualification |
46 |
|
|
3.3.3.5 Communication Between QDS-N and PICS |
46 |
|
|
3.3.4 QDS-PAMS |
46 |
|
|
3.3.5 Mini-Overview Display |
46 |
|
|
3.3.6 Backup Indication for QDS PAMS |
46 |
|
|
3.3.7 Optimizing BCP Layout Base on HFE Method |
46 |
|
|
3.3.8 Functional and Task Analysis Optimization |
46 |
|
|
3.4 Conclusion |
47 |
|
|
Nomenclatures |
47 |
|
|
References |
47 |
|
|
4: U.S. Department of Energy Instrumentation and Controls Technology Research for Advanced Small Modular Reactors |
48 |
|
|
4.1 Introduction |
48 |
|
|
4.2 Advanced SMR R&D Program Overview |
49 |
|
|
4.3 DOE Research on ICHMI Technology for SMRs |
49 |
|
|
4.3.1 ICHMI Research Drivers for SMRs |
49 |
|
|
4.3.1.1 Unique Operational and Process Characteristics |
50 |
|
|
4.3.1.2 Affordability |
50 |
|
|
4.3.1.3 Enhanced Functionality |
51 |
|
|
4.3.2 Needs and Challenges for ICHMI Technology Research |
51 |
|
|
4.3.3 DOE Research Activities Under the ICHMI Research Pathway |
52 |
|
|
4.4 Conclusions |
53 |
|
|
References |
54 |
|
|
5: Application of FPGA to Nuclear Power Plant I&C Systems |
55 |
|
|
5.1 Introduction |
55 |
|
|
5.2 Overview of FPGA |
56 |
|
|
5.2.1 FPGA Device |
56 |
|
|
5.2.2 Development of FPGA |
56 |
|
|
5.3 Application of FPGA in NPP |
57 |
|
|
5.3.1 General |
57 |
|
|
5.3.2 Development Process and Verification and Validation Efforts |
57 |
|
|
5.3.3 Equipment Qualification (EQ) and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Qualification |
58 |
|
|
5.3.4 Standards |
58 |
|
|
5.4 Toshiba FPGA-Based I&C Systems |
58 |
|
|
5.4.1 System Architecture |
58 |
|
|
5.4.2 Power Range Neutron Monitor (PRNM) |
59 |
|
|
5.4.3 RTIS |
59 |
|
|
5.4.4 FPGA-Based Non-safety Systems |
60 |
|
|
5.4.5 Advantage of Toshiba FPGA-Based I&C Systems |
60 |
|
|
5.5 Conclusions |
60 |
|
|
Nomenclatures |
61 |
|
|
References |
61 |
|
|
6: Prejob Briefing Using Process Data and Tagout/Line-up Data on 2D Drawings |
62 |
|
|
6.1 Introduction |
62 |
|
|
6.2 CAD Drawings |
63 |
|
|
6.2.1 Existing Drawings Versus New Drawings |
63 |
|
|
6.2.2 A Generic 2D CAD Format Developed by EDF |
63 |
|
|
6.3 Links Between CAD Business Objects and Other Sources of Data |
63 |
|
|
6.3.1 Business Objects are Central |
63 |
|
|
6.3.2 Overview of the Architecture |
63 |
|
|
6.4 Tagouts and Alignments Preparation on Drawings |
64 |
|
|
6.5 Process Data Visualization on P&ID |
65 |
|
|
6.6 Rapid Application Design Method |
65 |
|
|
6.6.1 The Working with End Users |
67 |
|
|
6.6.2 The Working with the Software Supplier |
67 |
|
|
6.7 Conclusion |
68 |
|
|
Nomenclatures |
68 |
|
|
References |
68 |
|
|
7: Study on Modeling of an Integrated Control and Condition Monitoring System for Nuclear Power Plants |
69 |
|
|
7.1 Introduction |
69 |
|
|
7.2 Overall Scheme of the Integrated Control and Condition Monitoring System |
70 |
|
|
7.2.1 Function Analysis of the Integrated System |
70 |
|
|
7.2.1.1 Control Subsystem Function Analysis |
70 |
|
|
7.2.1.2 Condition Monitoring Subsystem Function Analysis |
70 |
|
|
7.2.1.3 The Overall Function Analysis of the Control and Condition Monitoring Integrated System |
70 |
|
|
7.2.2 System Hardware and Software Requirements |
71 |
|
|
7.2.3 Characteristic Features of the Integrated System and Its Configuration |
71 |
|
|
7.3 Control and Condition Monitoring Integrated System Modeling |
73 |
|
|
7.3.1 Modeling Methods |
73 |
|
|
7.3.1.1 Structured Modeling Methods IDEF0 |
73 |
|
|
7.3.1.2 Based on Scene Modeling Method UCM |
74 |
|
|
7.3.1.3 IDEF0/UCM Integrated Modeling Methods |
75 |
|
|
7.3.2 Modeling Study for the Integrated System Based on the IDEF0/UCM Integrated Methods |
75 |
|
|
7.3.2.1 The Overall System Model |
75 |
|
|
7.3.2.2 IDEF0 and UCM Model of the System Module |
77 |
|
|
7.4 Conclusion |
79 |
|
|
Nomenclatures |
79 |
|
|
References |
79 |
|
|
8: A Toolkit for Computerized Operating Procedure of Complex Industrial Systems with IVI-COM Technology |
81 |
|
|
8.1 Introduction |
81 |
|
|
8.2 Hierarchy for Operating Procedure |
82 |
|
|
8.3 Design of Procedure Development Toolkit |
82 |
|
|
8.4 IVI Architecture |
83 |
|
|
8.5 Prototype System of Integrated Tool |
84 |
|
|
8.6 Conclusions and Perspectives |
85 |
|
|
References |
86 |
|
|
9: Development and Design Guideline for Computerized Human–Machine Interface in the Main Control Rooms of Nuclear Power Plants |
87 |
|
|
9.1 Introduction |
87 |
|
|
9.2 Position of JEAG4617 in the Japanese Safety Regulations |
88 |
|
|
9.3 Scope of Application |
88 |
|
|
9.4 Organization of the Guidelines |
88 |
|
|
9.5 Contents of the Guideline |
89 |
|
|
9.5.1 Functional and Design Requirements |
89 |
|
|
9.5.1.1 Functional Requirements |
89 |
|
|
9.5.1.2 Design Requirements |
89 |
|
|
9.5.2 Development and Design Processes |
89 |
|
|
9.5.3 Commentary |
89 |
|
|
9.6 Present Status of the Guideline |
89 |
|
|
9.7 Computerized HMI in the MCR of NPPs in Japan |
89 |
|
|
9.8 Operation in ABWR Type MCR at the Occurrence of the Niigata-Chuetsu- Oki Earthquake |
91 |
|
|
9.9 Conclusions |
91 |
|
|
References |
91 |
|
|
Part II: Risk Monitor Methods for Large and Complex Plants |
92 |
|
|
10: Overview of System Reliability Analyses for PSA |
93 |
|
|
10.1 Introduction |
93 |
|
|
10.2 What Is a System? |
93 |
|
|
10.3 Systems Engineering and Related Fields |
94 |
|
|
10.3.1 Systems Engineering |
94 |
|
|
10.3.2 Operations Research (OR) |
94 |
|
|
10.3.2.1 Cake Shop Example |
94 |
|
|
10.3.2.2 Linear Programming |
95 |
|
|
10.3.2.3 Decision Theory |
95 |
|
|
10.3.2.4 Game Theory |
95 |
|
|
10.3.2.5 Queuing Theory |
95 |
|
|
10.3.3 Industrial Engineering (IE) |
95 |
|
|
10.3.4 Quality Control (QC) |
96 |
|
|
10.4 Probabilistic Safety Assessment |
96 |
|
|
10.5 System Reliability Analysis Methods |
96 |
|
|
10.5.1 Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) |
97 |
|
|
10.5.2 Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP) |
97 |
|
|
10.5.3 Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) |
97 |
|
|
10.5.4 Markov Model |
97 |
|
|
10.5.5 Event Tree Analysis (ETA) |
98 |
|
|
10.5.6 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) |
99 |
|
|
10.5.7 GO Methodology |
99 |
|
|
10.5.8 Petri Net |
99 |
|
|
10.5.9 Bayesian Network (BN) |
100 |
|
|
10.5.10 Digraph Matrix |
100 |
|
|
10.5.11 Dynamic Event Tree |
101 |
|
|
10.5.12 Goal Tree-Success Tree (GTST) |
101 |
|
|
10.5.13 Continuous Event Tree |
101 |
|
|
10.5.14 Discrete Event Simulation |
101 |
|
|
10.5.15 Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology (DFM) |
102 |
|
|
10.5.16 Cell-to-Cell Mapping Technique (CCMT) |
102 |
|
|
10.5.17 Dynamic Logical Analysis Methodology (DYLAM) |
102 |
|
|
10.5.18 GO-FLOW Methodology |
103 |
|
|
10.5.19 Summary of the System Reliability Analyses |
103 |
|
|
10.6 Summary |
103 |
|
|
10.7 Answer of the Questions |
104 |
|
|
References |
104 |
|
|
11: A Systematic Fault Tree Analysis Based on Multi-level Flow Modeling |
106 |
|
|
11.1 Introduction |
106 |
|
|
11.2 Fault Tree Construction Based on the Model by Multi-level Flow Modeling |
107 |
|
|
11.2.1 Multi-level Flow Modeling |
107 |
|
|
11.2.2 Knowledge and Data for FT Construction |
107 |
|
|
11.2.3 Influence Propagation by the Change of Functional Achievement |
108 |
|
|
11.2.4 FT Construction Algorithm |
109 |
|
|
11.3 FT Construction of a Simple Chemical Plant |
109 |
|
|
11.3.1 Target Chemical Plant |
109 |
|
|
11.3.2 MFM Model for a Cooling Plant of Nitric Acid |
109 |
|
|
11.3.3 FT Construction Results |
110 |
|
|
11.3.4 Discussions |
110 |
|
|
11.4 Conclusions |
112 |
|
|
References |
112 |
|
|
12: Reliability Graph with General Gates: A Novel Method for Reliability Analysis |
113 |
|
|
12.1 Introduction |
113 |
|
|
12.2 Reliability Graph with General Gates |
114 |
|
|
12.2.1 Reliability Graph |
114 |
|
|
12.2.2 Reliability Graph with General Gates |
115 |
|
|
12.2.3 Quantification of the RGGG |
115 |
|
|
12.2.3.1 Transforming to Bayesian Networks |
115 |
|
|
12.2.3.2 Modeling of RGGG |
115 |
|
|
12.2.3.3 OR Node |
116 |
|
|
12.2.3.4 AND Node |
117 |
|
|
12.2.3.5 K-out-of-N Node |
117 |
|
|
12.2.4 Examples |
118 |
|
|
12.3 Extension of the RGGG |
118 |
|
|
12.3.1 Dynamic RGGG |
119 |
|
|
12.3.1.1 Addition of Dynamic Nodes |
119 |
|
|
12.3.1.2 Quantification of Dynamic Nodes |
120 |
|
|
12.3.2 A Software Tool for the Dynamic RGGG |
122 |
|
|
12.3.2.1 Example |
122 |
|
|
12.3.3 Repairable RGGG |
123 |
|
|
12.3.3.1 Availability of Simple Repairable Process |
124 |
|
|
12.3.3.2 Independent Repairable System |
124 |
|
|
12.3.3.3 Dependent Series Repairable System |
124 |
|
|
12.3.3.4 4K/M Redundant Parallel Repairable System |
125 |
|
|
12.3.3.5 Example |
126 |
|
|
12.4 Summary and Conclusions |
130 |
|
|
References |
130 |
|
|
13: Design of Risk Monitor for Nuclear Reactor Plants |
132 |
|
|
13.1 Introduction |
132 |
|
|
13.2 Distributed HMI System |
133 |
|
|
13.3 Risk Monitor |
133 |
|
|
13.3.1 Definition of Risk and Risk Ranking |
134 |
|
|
13.3.1.1 Design Principle of Nuclear Safety |
134 |
|
|
13.3.1.2 Risk to be Monitored |
134 |
|
|
13.3.1.3 Severe Accident Phenomena |
134 |
|
|
13.3.1.4 Risk Ranking |
134 |
|
|
13.3.2 Anatomy of Fault Event Occurrence |
135 |
|
|
13.3.3 Risk Monitor by Semiotic Modeling |
136 |
|
|
13.3.4 Plant DiD Risk Monitor and Reliability Monitor |
136 |
|
|
13.3.5 Visualization as Dynamic Risk Monitor |
137 |
|
|
13.4 Example Practice of a Reliability Monitor |
137 |
|
|
13.4.1 Description of Containment Spray System |
137 |
|
|
13.4.2 FMEA for Containment Spray System |
139 |
|
|
13.4.3 GO-FLOW Analysis for Containment Spray System |
139 |
|
|
13.5 Concluding Remarks |
141 |
|
|
References |
141 |
|
|
14: Review of Practicing Level-2 Probabilistic Safety Analysis for Chinese Nuclear Power Plants |
143 |
|
|
14.1 Introduction |
143 |
|
|
14.2 Review of Each Technical Element |
144 |
|
|
14.2.1 Familiarization with Plant Data and Systems |
144 |
|
|
14.2.2 Interface with Level-1 |
144 |
|
|
14.2.3 Containment Performance Analysis |
145 |
|
|
14.2.4 Severe Accident Progression and Containment Event Tree Analysis |
145 |
|
|
14.2.5 Source Term and Release Category Analysis |
146 |
|
|
14.2.6 Sensitivity, Importance, and Uncertainty Analysis |
148 |
|
|
14.2.7 Outcome of Level-2 PSA |
148 |
|
|
14.3 Conclusion |
148 |
|
|
References |
148 |
|
|
15: Risk Monitoring for Nuclear Power Plant Applications Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
150 |
|
|
15.1 Introduction |
150 |
|
|
15.2 Characteristics of the Risk Monitoring System COSMOS |
151 |
|
|
15.3 Detailed Functions of COSMOS |
151 |
|
|
15.3.1 COSMOS-FP |
151 |
|
|
15.3.1.1 On-Line Maintenance Scheduling and Risk Evaluation |
151 |
|
|
15.3.1.2 For Successive Execution of Systems and Event Trees (ETs) Corresponding to Exact Plant Conditions (In-Service, Standby or OOS of PSA Equipment) |
152 |
|
|
15.3.1.3 For Realization of Speeding-Up Quantification |
152 |
|
|
15.3.2 COSMOS-SD |
153 |
|
|
15.3.2.1 For Shutdown Scheduling and Risk Evaluation |
153 |
|
|
15.3.2.2 For Improvement of a Shutdown RISKMAN Model to Speed-Up Quantification for Various POS Status |
153 |
|
|
15.4 Risk Monitoring Usage |
154 |
|
|
15.4.1 At-Power Risk Monitoring in Case of On-Line Maintenance (COSMOS-FP) |
154 |
|
|
15.4.2 Shutdown Risk Evaluation for Every Outage (COSMOS-SD) |
154 |
|
|
15.5 Further Enhancements of COSMOS |
156 |
|
|
15.6 Conclusion |
156 |
|
|
Nomenclatures |
156 |
|
|
References |
156 |
|
|
Part III: Condition Monitors for Plant Components |
157 |
|
|
16: Condition Monitoring for Maintenance Support |
158 |
|
|
16.1 Introduction |
158 |
|
|
16.2 Physical Modelling Method |
159 |
|
|
16.2.1 Flow Sheets and Data Reconciliation |
159 |
|
|
16.2.2 Residuals |
159 |
|
|
16.2.3 Statistical Distribution of Residuals |
159 |
|
|
16.2.4 Redundancy |
160 |
|
|
16.2.4.1 Physical Redundancy |
160 |
|
|
16.2.4.2 Analytical Redundancy |
160 |
|
|
16.2.4.3 Apparent Redundancy |
161 |
|
|
16.2.5 Modelling Equations |
161 |
|
|
16.2.5.1 Fundamental Equations |
161 |
|
|
16.2.5.2 Analytical Equations |
161 |
|
|
16.2.5.3 Empirical Equations |
161 |
|
|
16.3 Time Series Analysis |
161 |
|
|
16.4 Analysis of Variances |
162 |
|
|
16.5 Fault Detection in Practice |
162 |
|
|
16.6 Conclusions |
163 |
|
|
References |
163 |
|
|
17: Online Condition Monitoring to Enable Extended Operation of Nuclear Power Plants |
164 |
|
|
17.1 Introduction |
164 |
|
|
17.2 Plant Life Management |
165 |
|
|
17.3 Life-Beyond 60 Years |
166 |
|
|
17.4 Online Measurements in NPPs |
167 |
|
|
17.4.1 Active Components |
167 |
|
|
17.4.2 Passive Components |
167 |
|
|
17.4.2.1 Monitoring Large Defects in Metal Components |
168 |
|
|
17.4.2.2 Monitoring Early Degradation in Metals |
170 |
|
|
17.4.2.3 Primary Containment Structures |
171 |
|
|
17.4.2.4 Cable Condition Monitoring |
172 |
|
|
17.5 Prognostics for the Nuclear Power Industry |
173 |
|
|
17.5.1 Integrated Prognostic |
175 |
|
|
17.6 Technology/Knowledge Gaps |
176 |
|
|
17.7 Conclusions |
176 |
|
|
References |
176 |
|
|
18: Using Condition-based Maintenance and Reliability-centered Maintenance to Improve Maintenance in Nuclear Power Plants |
180 |
|
|
18.1 Introduction |
180 |
|
|
18.2 Comparison of Different Maintenance Strategies in NPPs |
181 |
|
|
18.3 Theoretical Foundation and Methodology of CBM |
183 |
|
|
18.4 Application Experience of CBM in Daya Bay Nuclear Power Base |
185 |
|
|
18.4.1 Optimization of Equipment Maintenance Programme by Introducing CBM Methodologies |
185 |
|
|
18.4.2 The Development of PdM Management System |
186 |
|
|
18.4.3 The Development of Intelligent Failure Diagnosis Expert System |
187 |
|
|
18.5 Conclusion |
187 |
|
|
Nomenclatures |
188 |
|
|
References |
188 |
|
|
19: Advanced Management of Pipe Wall Thinning Based on Prediction-Monitor Fusion |
189 |
|
|
19.1 Introduction |
189 |
|
|
19.2 Pipe Wall Thinning Management |
189 |
|
|
19.3 Prediction by FAC Analyses |
190 |
|
|
19.4 Condition Monitoring |
191 |
|
|
19.5 Reliability Assessment |
192 |
|
|
19.6 New Strategy of PWTM |
194 |
|
|
19.7 Concluding Remarks |
194 |
|
|
References |
195 |
|
|
20: Non-destructive Evaluation of Material State by Acoustic, Electromagnetic and Thermal Techniques |
196 |
|
|
20.1 Introduction |
196 |
|
|
20.2 NDE Using Material Properties |
197 |
|
|
20.2.1 Specimens for NDE Experiments |
197 |
|
|
20.2.2 Acoustic Impedance Method |
197 |
|
|
20.2.3 Magnetoacoustoelasticity |
197 |
|
|
20.2.4 Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing |
197 |
|
|
20.2.5 Thermograph with Magnetic Heating |
197 |
|
|
20.3 NDE of Mechanical Degradation |
197 |
|
|
20.3.1 Specimens |
197 |
|
|
20.3.2 Acoustic Impedance Method |
198 |
|
|
20.3.3 Magnetoacoustoelasticity |
198 |
|
|
20.3.4 Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing |
199 |
|
|
20.3.5 Thermograph with Magnetic Heating |
199 |
|
|
20.4 NDE of Plastic Strain and Residual Stress |
199 |
|
|
20.4.1 Specimens |
199 |
|
|
20.4.2 Acoustic Impedance Method |
200 |
|
|
20.4.3 Magnetoacoustoelasticity |
201 |
|
|
20.4.4 Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing |
202 |
|
|
20.4.5 Thermograph with Magnetic Heating |
203 |
|
|
20.5 Conclusion |
204 |
|
|
References |
204 |
|
|
21: Non-contact Acoustic Emission Measurement for Condition Monitoring of Bearings in Rotating Machines Using Laser Interferometry |
205 |
|
|
21.1 Introduction |
205 |
|
|
21.2 Experimental System |
206 |
|
|
21.3 Experimental Results and Discussion |
207 |
|
|
21.4 Conclusions |
213 |
|
|
References |
213 |
|
|
22: Crack Growth Monitoring by Strain Measurements |
214 |
|
|
22.1 Introduction |
214 |
|
|
22.2 Crack Growth Monitoring Method |
215 |
|
|
22.2.1 Basic Procedure |
215 |
|
|
22.2.2 Procedure for Multiple Strain Measurements |
216 |
|
|
22.3 Experiment |
217 |
|
|
22.3.1 Experimental Procedure |
217 |
|
|
22.3.2 Experimental Results |
217 |
|
|
22.4 Estimation of Crack Size |
219 |
|
|
22.4.1 Finite Element Analysis |
219 |
|
|
22.4.2 Estimation Using Single Strain Gage |
219 |
|
|
22.4.3 Estimation Using Multiple Strain Gages |
220 |
|
|
22.5 Discussion |
220 |
|
|
22.6 Conclusion |
221 |
|
|
References |
221 |
|
|
23: Acoustic Monitoring of Rotating Machine by Advanced Signal Processing Technology |
223 |
|
|
23.1 Introduction |
223 |
|
|
23.2 Signal Processing Methods |
224 |
|
|
23.2.1 Pre-processing for Feature Extraction |
224 |
|
|
23.2.1.1 Log-Scale Auto-Power Spectral Density (log-APSD) |
224 |
|
|
23.2.1.2 Mel-Scale Auto-Power Spectral Density (Mel-scale-APSD) |
224 |
|
|
23.2.1.3 Cepstrum [ 5 ] |
224 |
|
|
23.2.2 Dimension Reduction for Visualization |
225 |
|
|
23.2.2.1 PCA Based Classification |
225 |
|
|
23.2.2.2 KPCA Based Classification [ 6, 7 ] |
225 |
|
|
23.2.2.3 Heuristic Classification |
225 |
|
|
23.2.3 State Discrimination for Anomaly Monitoring |
226 |
|
|
23.2.3.1 State Discrimination by PNN [ 8 ] |
226 |
|
|
23.2.3.2 State Discrimination by SVDD [ 9 ] |
226 |
|
|
23.3 Test Results |
227 |
|
|
23.3.1 Test Facility and Measurement |
227 |
|
|
23.3.2 Evaluation of Classification Performance of PCA, KPCA and a Heuristic Method |
227 |
|
|
23.3.3 Discrimination Results by PNN and SVDD |
229 |
|
|
23.4 Conclusions |
230 |
|
|
References |
231 |
|
|
24: The Wireless Diagnostic System for Motor Operated Valves |
232 |
|
|
24.1 Introduction |
232 |
|
|
24.2 Development of New Diagnostic System |
233 |
|
|
24.2.1 Points and Features |
233 |
|
|
24.2.2 Outline of Diagnostic Method |
233 |
|
|
24.2.3 Mock-Up Test Results |
233 |
|
|
24.2.4 Confirmation of Design Base Performance |
233 |
|
|
24.3 Development of Wireless Remote Diagnostic System |
234 |
|
|
24.3.1 Background of the Development |
234 |
|
|
24.3.2 Outline of Wireless Remote Diagnostic System |
234 |
|
|
24.4 Conclusions |
236 |
|
|
References |
236 |
|
|
Part IV: Virtual and Augmented Reality for Nuclear Power Plants |
237 |
|
|
25: Virtual and Augmented Reality in the Nuclear Plant Lifecycle Perspective |
238 |
|
|
25.1 Introduction |
238 |
|
|
25.1.1 The Halden Boiling Heavy Water Reactor |
239 |
|
|
25.1.2 Safety MTO: Man Technology Organisation |
239 |
|
|
25.1.3 Halden Virtual Reality Centre (HVRC) |
239 |
|
|
25.1.4 Definition of Virtual Reality |
240 |
|
|
25.1.5 Definition of Augmented Reality |
240 |
|
|
25.1.6 Areas of Use of VR and AR at IFE |
240 |
|
|
25.2 VR and AR in Design |
240 |
|
|
25.2.1 Reuse of 3D Models in the Design Phase |
241 |
|
|
25.2.2 Control Room Design and Validation Using VR |
241 |
|
|
25.2.3 User-Friendly AR Technology for Real World Use |
242 |
|
|
25.2.3.1 The AR Solution Developed at IFE |
242 |
|
|
25.2.3.2 The Role of AR in the Plant Life Cycle |
242 |
|
|
25.3 VR in Operation and Maintenance |
243 |
|
|
25.3.1 Requirements to Training Safer Refuelling |
243 |
|
|
25.3.2 VR Applications at LNPP for Training |
243 |
|
|
25.3.3 Creating Up-to-Date Data and 3D Models |
244 |
|
|
25.3.4 Use of the VR Solutions in Daily Training |
244 |
|
|
25.3.5 Future Enhancements for Use on New Scenarios |
244 |
|
|
25.4 VR in Decommissioning |
244 |
|
|
25.4.1 Challenges in Decommissioning Planning |
245 |
|
|
25.4.2 Establishing a Visualisation Centre at ChNPP |
246 |
|
|
25.4.3 Overall Features of the CDVC |
246 |
|
|
25.4.4 Reducing Radiation Exposure Dose Using VR |
246 |
|
|
25.4.5 Efficient Reuse of 3D Data |
246 |
|
|
25.5 Future Plans at LNPP and ChNPP |
246 |
|
|
25.6 Nuclear Energy’s Role in Future Sustainable Energy Supplies |
246 |
|
|
25.6.1 VR and AR Contribution to the Nuclear Safety for Symbiosis and Sustainability |
247 |
|
|
25.7 Summary |
248 |
|
|
References |
249 |
|
|
26: A Feasibility Study on Worksite Visualization System Using Augmented Reality for Fugen NPP |
251 |
|
|
26.1 Introduction |
251 |
|
|
26.2 Decommissioning of Fugen |
251 |
|
|
26.2.1 Outline of Fugen |
251 |
|
|
26.2.2 Decommissioning Program of Fugen |
252 |
|
|
26.2.3 Current Status of Decommissioning |
254 |
|
|
26.3 Decommissioning Engineering Support System (DEXUS) |
255 |
|
|
26.4 Worksite Visualization System (WVS) |
255 |
|
|
26.4.1 Reference Support for Cutting Lines and Restraint Parts |
256 |
|
|
26.4.2 Record Support for Progress of Dismantling |
256 |
|
|
26.4.3 Prototype System Development |
256 |
|
|
26.4.3.1 Realization of Superimposing 3D CAD Data |
256 |
|
|
26.4.3.2 Cutting Function of 3D CAD Data |
257 |
|
|
26.4.3.3 User Interface and Hardware |
257 |
|
|
26.5 Feasibility Evaluation of WVS |
258 |
|
|
26.5.1 Purpose and Outline of Evaluation |
258 |
|
|
26.5.2 Evaluation Method |
258 |
|
|
26.5.2.1 Evaluation Environment |
258 |
|
|
26.5.2.2 Evaluators |
258 |
|
|
26.5.2.3 Dismantling Scenario |
258 |
|
|
26.5.2.4 Procedure of Evaluation |
259 |
|
|
26.5.2.5 Questionnaire |
259 |
|
|
26.5.3 Evaluation Result |
259 |
|
|
26.5.4 Discussion |
259 |
|
|
26.5.5 System Function |
260 |
|
|
26.5.6 Usability |
261 |
|
|
26.6 Summary |
261 |
|
|
References |
261 |
|
|
27: Augmented Reality for Improved Communication of Construction and Maintenance Plans in Nuclear Power Plants |
262 |
|
|
27.1 Introduction |
262 |
|
|
27.2 Augmented Reality |
263 |
|
|
27.2.1 AR Binoculars |
263 |
|
|
27.3 Real World Applications |
264 |
|
|
27.3.1 Augmented Reality and Construction |
264 |
|
|
27.3.2 Augmented Reality and Training of Operators |
265 |
|
|
27.3.3 Augmented Reality and Maintenance |
266 |
|
|
27.4 Conclusion |
267 |
|
|
References |
267 |
|
|
28: 3D Representation of Radioisotopic Dose Rates Within Nuclear Plants for Improved Radioprotection and Plant Safety |
268 |
|
|
28.1 Introduction |
268 |
|
|
28.2 EDF CZT Gamma Spectrometer |
269 |
|
|
28.2.1 Acquisitions |
269 |
|
|
28.2.2 Spectral Analysis |
270 |
|
|
28.3 Dose Calculations |
270 |
|
|
28.4 Combining Radiological Information and VR |
271 |
|
|
28.4.1 Example 1: Optimising Shielding |
271 |
|
|
28.4.1.1 Visualising Radioisotopic Dose Maps |
271 |
|
|
28.4.2 Example 2: Radiation Decay |
272 |
|
|
28.5 Discussion and Conclusions |
273 |
|
|
References |
274 |
|
|
29: Wide Area Tracking Method for Augmented Reality Supporting Nuclear Power Plant Maintenance Work |
275 |
|
|
29.1 Introduction |
275 |
|
|
29.2 Proposal of a Tracking Method Using Multi-range Markers |
276 |
|
|
29.2.1 Design of Multi-range Markers |
276 |
|
|
29.2.2 Algorithm to Recognize Multi-range Markers |
276 |
|
|
29.2.3 Algorithm to Calculate the Relative Position and Orientation Between a Camera and Markers |
278 |
|
|
29.3 Evaluation of the Proposed Method |
278 |
|
|
29.3.1 Recognition Range |
278 |
|
|
29.3.2 Stability of Marker Recognition Under Variable Illumination Conditions |
279 |
|
|
29.3.3 Processing Speed of Tracking |
279 |
|
|
29.3.4 Misrecognition of Markers |
279 |
|
|
29.3.5 Area Within Which Tracking Can Be Executed |
279 |
|
|
29.4 Conclusions |
280 |
|
|
References |
281 |
|
|
Part V: Software Reliability V&V for Nuclear Power Plants |
282 |
|
|
30: Research on Software Systems Dependability at the OECD Halden Reactor Project |
283 |
|
|
30.1 Introduction |
283 |
|
|
30.2 Software Safety Integrity |
284 |
|
|
30.3 The Research Problems |
285 |
|
|
30.3.1 Software Development |
285 |
|
|
30.3.2 Software Assurance |
286 |
|
|
30.3.3 Software Approval and Deployment |
287 |
|
|
30.4 Safety Demonstration |
288 |
|
|
30.5 Conclusions |
288 |
|
|
References |
289 |
|
|
31: High Level Issues in Reliability Quantification of Safety-Critical Software |
290 |
|
|
31.1 Introduction |
290 |
|
|
31.2 BBN Modeling |
291 |
|
|
31.2.1 Assessment Approaches |
291 |
|
|
31.2.2 Consideration on Evidence |
291 |
|
|
31.2.3 Cause-Consequence Relation |
292 |
|
|
31.3 Statistical Testing |
293 |
|
|
31.4 Conclusions |
294 |
|
|
Nomenclature |
294 |
|
|
References |
294 |
|
|
32: Software Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Risk Analysis |
296 |
|
|
32.1 Introduction |
296 |
|
|
32.2 State-of-the-Art of Software Reliability in PRA for Nuclear Power Plants |
296 |
|
|
32.2.1 Software Reliability |
296 |
|
|
32.2.2 Software Reliability Quantification |
297 |
|
|
32.2.3 Software Reliability Estimation in PRA |
297 |
|
|
32.2.3.1 Screening Out Approach |
297 |
|
|
32.2.3.2 Screening Value Approach |
298 |
|
|
32.2.3.3 Expert Judgement Approach |
298 |
|
|
32.2.3.4 Operating Experience Approach |
298 |
|
|
32.2.4 Conclusions on Software Reliability in PRA |
298 |
|
|
32.3 Failure Modes Taxonomy |
299 |
|
|
32.3.1 Background |
299 |
|
|
32.3.2 General Approach |
299 |
|
|
32.3.3 Requirements for the Failure Modes Taxonomy |
299 |
|
|
32.3.4 Levels of Details of the Taxonomy |
300 |
|
|
32.3.5 Failure Modes |
300 |
|
|
32.4 Safety Justification Framework |
300 |
|
|
32.4.1 Safety Case |
300 |
|
|
32.4.2 Software Reliability Assessment Case |
301 |
|
|
32.4.3 Software Reliability Claims |
301 |
|
|
32.4.4 Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) |
301 |
|
|
32.4.5 Types of Evidence |
301 |
|
|
32.4.6 BBN Model Suggestions in HARMONICS |
302 |
|
|
32.5 Conclusions |
302 |
|
|
Nomenclatures |
303 |
|
|
References |
303 |
|
|
About the Editors |
305 |
|
|
Author Index |
307 |
|
|
Subject Index |
309 |
|